COMMUNICATION, DOCUMENTATION AND HANDOFF
Everything you find at the bedside is worthless if it dies in your head. The most common root cause of serious patient harm in hospitals is not a missed lab value or a dull stethoscope — it is a communication failure: a nurse who noticed something and said it too softly, a handoff that skipped the one detail that mattered, a chart entry so vague that the next nurse could not tell whether the patient was improving. This chapter teaches the three ways nursing assessment travels: to the patient (therapeutic communication), to the team (escalation, SBAR, closed-loop verification) and to the future (the legal health record and the handoff). You will learn exact phrasing — what to say, what to write, what to refuse to write — and the numeric thresholds that convert an observation into a phone call you make right now instead of at the end of the shift.
By the end of this chapter you can
- Apply therapeutic communication techniques and identify non-therapeutic responses that shut a patient down.
- Adapt communication for infants, children, pregnancy, older adults, limited English proficiency and low health literacy, using a qualified medical interpreter and teach-back.
- Escalate a deteriorating patient using SBAR, stating the specific vital-sign and symptom thresholds that require notification now.
- Perform closed-loop communication, including read-back of verbal orders and critical values, and invoke the two-challenge rule and chain of command.
- Write objective, timed, defensible documentation, and convert a vague entry into a precise one — including describing cyanosis, jaundice, pallor and erythema accurately across skin tones.
- Document a physical assessment in the sequence it was performed — inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation — and state the abdominal exception.
- Correct an error, enter a late entry, avoid Do Not Use abbreviations and protect PHI under HIPAA.
- Conduct a standardized handoff (I-PASS or ISBAR) and a bedside shift report with the patient present.
- Delegate to UAP using the five rights of delegation, and state what may never be delegated: assessment, teaching, evaluation and the unstable patient.
Section 1Therapeutic Communication and the Nurse’s Presence

What makes communication therapeutic
Social conversation is symmetrical: two people trade stories and both leave satisfied. Therapeutic communication is deliberately asymmetrical. It is goal-directed, time-limited and centered entirely on the patient’s needs, not yours. You will not tell the patient about your own gallbladder surgery. You will not reassure them that everything will be fine, because you do not know that and saying it ends the conversation. What you will do is create enough safety that a frightened adult tells a stranger in scrubs that they have not taken their blood pressure medication in three months because it costs eighty dollars a month.
Hildegard Peplau described the nurse—patient relationship in three phases, and they hold up at the bedside. In the orientation phase you introduce yourself by name and role, state what you are going to do and how long it will take, and set the frame: “Good morning, Mr. Okonkwo, I’m Dana, I’m the registered nurse taking care of you until seven tonight. I’d like to spend about ten minutes going over how last night went and then listen to your heart and lungs.” In the working phase the actual assessment, teaching and problem-solving happen. In the termination phase you summarize, confirm understanding and say what happens next — including who is coming after you. Skipping orientation is the most common student error, and it is why patients answer their questions in monosyllables.
The techniques below are not scripts to memorize for an exam; they are the moves you will actually make forty times a shift. Practice them until they stop feeling artificial. The single highest-yield one is silence: after you ask a hard question, count to five in your head before you fill the space. Patients disclose in the gap.
| Technique | What it sounds like | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| Open-ended question | “Tell me what the pain has been like since yesterday.” | Cannot be answered yes or no; yields the patient’s own story and words. |
| Silence | (pause 3–5 seconds, maintain attention) | Gives the patient room to organize a difficult thought. |
| Reflection | “You said you felt like a burden.” | Returns the feeling to the patient without judging it; invites elaboration. |
| Restating / paraphrasing | “So the shortness of breath only happens when you climb stairs.” | Confirms accuracy and shows you were listening. |
| Clarification | “I’m not sure I follow — when you say dizzy, do you mean the room spins or you feel faint?” | Separates vertigo from presyncope; the words patients use are imprecise. |
| Focusing | “Let’s stay with the chest pressure for a minute.” | Redirects a wandering history to the safety-critical thread. |
| Offering self | “I’ll sit with you for a few minutes.” | Presence without demanding conversation. |
| Making an observation | “You’ve been very quiet since your daughter left.” | Names non-verbal data gently; opens a door the patient can walk through or not. |
| Summarizing | “Here’s what I heard, tell me what I got wrong.” | Closes the encounter and lets the patient correct the record. |
| Non-therapeutic response | Example | What it actually does |
|---|---|---|
| False reassurance | “Don’t worry, everything will be fine.” | Dismisses fear and tells the patient not to bring it up again. |
| Why questions | “Why didn’t you take your insulin?” | Reads as accusation; produces defensiveness instead of the real barrier. Ask “What made it hard to take?” |
| Giving advice | “If I were you I’d have the surgery.” | Substitutes your values for theirs; undermines autonomy. |
| Changing the subject | Patient mentions dying; nurse asks about lunch. | Signals the topic is forbidden. |
| Approval / disapproval | “That was a good decision.” / “You shouldn’t feel that way.” | Makes the patient work for your approval and hide anything you might judge. |
| Defensiveness | “The night nurse is very experienced.” | Shuts down a complaint that may contain a safety report. |
| Stereotyped comfort | “Everything happens for a reason.” | Cliché substitutes for presence. |
Non-verbal communication, environment and body position
Patients decide within seconds whether you are actually available. Sit down. Studies of hospitalized patients consistently show that when the clinician sits, patients estimate the visit as longer than it was and report better communication — even when the actual seated time is shorter. Get your eyes at or below the level of the patient’s eyes. Standing over a supine adult is a power position and it feels like one. If there is no chair, crouch or sit on the edge of the recliner — not on the bed, which invades personal territory and is an infection-control problem.
The classic mnemonic is SOLER: Sit squarely facing the patient, Open posture (arms and legs uncrossed), Lean slightly forward, Eye contact appropriate to culture, Relaxed. Add the practical items SOLER leaves out: silence the television with permission, close the curtain and the door, lower the bed rail on the side you are sitting on while you are there and raise it again before you leave, and put your phone or workstation-on-wheels where it is not between you and the person. If you must type, narrate it — “I’m going to look at the screen for a second to check your last blood pressure, keep talking.”
Personal space matters and varies. Hall’s zones — intimate (0 to 18 inches), personal (18 inches to 4 feet), social (4 to 12 feet) — are a rough North American map, not a rule. Nursing work forces you into the intimate zone constantly, which is exactly why you announce each entry into it: “I’m going to listen to your back now, I’ll lift your gown from behind.” Direct eye contact is a sign of respect and attention in much of the United States and Western Europe, and can be read as confrontational or disrespectful in some East Asian, Indigenous American and traditional Middle Eastern contexts, particularly across gender or age differences. The safe practice is to offer eye contact and follow the patient’s lead rather than to enforce it.
Communicating across the lifespan, language and literacy
Infants and toddlers. Communication is with the caregiver and through the caregiver. Keep the child on the parent’s lap for as much of the exam as possible, save the invasive and distressing parts for last (ears and throat in a toddler always go last), and use the parent’s words for body parts. For preschoolers, expect magical and literal thinking: never say you are going to “take” their blood pressure or “take a little blood,” and never say a procedure will not hurt if it will. Offer real, narrow choices — “Which arm?” not “Can I check your blood pressure?” School-age children want mechanism and honesty; show them the equipment. Adolescents require time alone without the parent, an explicit statement of confidentiality and its legal limits, and a non-reactive face.
Pregnancy. Position matters after roughly 20 weeks: avoid prolonged supine positioning, which can cause aortocaval compression and supine hypotensive syndrome. Interview in a left-lateral tilt or seated. Ask about intimate partner violence privately, with no partner or family member in the room and never through a family interpreter — pregnancy is a period of elevated risk.
Older adults. Presbycusis is high-frequency hearing loss, so shouting (which raises pitch) makes comprehension worse. Lower your pitch, slow down, face the person so they can lip-read, reduce background noise, and confirm with teach-back. Never use elderspeak — “sweetie,” “honey,” “are we ready for our bath?” It is associated with resistance to care and with worse self-rated function. Allow extra processing time; older adults answer accurately, just more slowly. Ask about, and document, the patient’s preferred name.
Limited English proficiency. Use a qualified medical interpreter — in person, by video or by phone. This is a federal civil-rights requirement under Title VI, not a courtesy, and it is a patient-safety intervention: encounters without professional interpretation carry significantly more clinically consequential errors. Do not use family members, and never use a child, as an interpreter except in a life-threatening emergency while a qualified interpreter is being obtained. Speak to the patient, not the interpreter, in the first person and in short segments. Document the interpreter’s name or ID number and the modality used. For patients who are Deaf, ask their preference; American Sign Language is a distinct language and written English is often not equivalent.
Low health literacy. Roughly one in three US adults has difficulty with everyday health information, and it is invisible — people compensate skillfully. Use plain language (“high blood pressure” not “hypertension,” “water pill” not “diuretic”), limit teaching to three key points per encounter, and close with teach-back: “I want to be sure I explained this well. Tell me in your own words how you’ll take this new water pill at home.” Teach-back tests the teaching, not the patient, and you must say so.
Therapeutic communication is a clinical skill with a technique and a sequence — sit, orient yourself and your role, ask open-endedly, tolerate silence, and verify with teach-back — and its failures are as consequential as a missed vital sign.
Section 2Speaking Up: SBAR, Red Flags and Closed-Loop Communication
SBAR: the structure that makes you sound credible
SBAR — Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation — was adapted from nuclear submarine practice for exactly the problem nurses have: transferring urgent information to someone with more authority, over the phone, in under ninety seconds, without being dismissed. Many facilities use ISBAR, adding Introduction at the front, or ISBARR, adding Read-back at the end. Use whichever your employer uses, and use it every time, including when it feels like overkill. Structure is what lets the receiver find the important item.
The part students under-use is the R. New nurses frequently deliver a flawless S, B and A and then stop, leaving the provider to guess what is being asked. State what you want, out loud, even if you are not sure it is the right ask: “I’d like you to come see her now,” “I’m requesting an order for a stat 12-lead and troponin,” “I need a set of blood cultures and an order to start fluids.” If you are wrong, you have still made the request explicit and the conversation moves faster. Also state your time expectation and confirm the plan: “If she isn’t better in thirty minutes, I’ll call you back.”
| Element | What goes in it | Worked example (2 a.m. call) |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Your name, role, unit, patient name, room | “Dr. Reyes, this is Dana Whitfield, RN on 4 West. I’m calling about Ellen Marks, room 412.” |
| Situation | The problem, in one sentence, right now | “She’s become short of breath in the last twenty minutes and her oxygen saturation has dropped to 88 percent on 2 liters nasal cannula.” |
| Background | Admitting diagnosis, day of stay, relevant history, pertinent meds, code status | “She’s a 68-year-old admitted two days ago with a right hip fracture, post-op day 1 from ORIF. History of atrial fibrillation and CHF. She’s on apixaban, held pre-op. Full code.” |
| Assessment | Current vitals with numbers, your exam findings, your clinical impression | “Right now: heart rate 122 and irregular, blood pressure 98/56, respirations 28, temperature 37.1 Celsius, SpO₂ 88 percent on 2 liters, now 93 percent on a 6-liter mask. Lungs are clear bilaterally, no new edema, right calf is soft and non-tender. She’s anxious and diaphoretic. I’m concerned about a pulmonary embolism.” |
| Recommendation | What you want, and by when | “I’d like you to come evaluate her now. In the meantime I’m requesting orders for a stat CT pulmonary angiogram, ECG, troponin and BNP, and continuous pulse oximetry.” |
| Read-back | Repeat every order back and get confirmation | “Reading back: stat CTPA, 12-lead ECG, troponin and BNP now, continuous pulse ox, keep SpO₂ above 92 percent, and you’ll be here in ten minutes. Is that correct?” |
Red flags: the numbers that mean call now
You cannot escalate what you cannot recognize. Learn the adult normal ranges cold, then learn the thresholds that override everything you had planned for the next hour. Facilities vary slightly — know your unit’s parameters and your rapid response team criteria — but the values below are the common defaults, and a patient meeting any of them needs a provider or rapid response call, not a recheck at the end of your med pass.
| Parameter | Expected adult | Escalate NOW | What it suggests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (oral) | 36.5–37.5 °C (97.7–99.5 °F) | >38.0 °C (100.4 °F) or <36.0 °C (96.8 °F) | Infection; hypothermia is an ominous sepsis sign, especially in older adults |
| Heart rate | 60–100 beats/min | <40 or >130 beats/min; any new irregular rhythm with symptoms | Arrhythmia, hypovolemia, sepsis, pain, hypoxia |
| Respiratory rate | 12–20 breaths/min | <8 or >28 breaths/min | The earliest and most-ignored sign of deterioration; <8 suggests opioid toxicity |
| Blood pressure | <120/<80 mmHg (normal) | Systolic <90 mmHg, or a drop of >40 mmHg from the patient’s baseline; systolic >180 or diastolic >120 with symptoms | Shock; hypertensive emergency |
| SpO₂ | 95–100 percent on room air | <90 percent, or any new increase in oxygen requirement | PE, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, atelectasis, mucus plug |
| Level of consciousness | Alert and oriented to baseline | Any new confusion, agitation, unarousability, or a drop of 2 or more points on the Glasgow Coma Scale | Hypoxia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, stroke, bleed, drug effect |
| Urine output | At least 0.5 mL/kg/hr (about 30 mL/hr in an average adult) | <30 mL/hr for 2 consecutive hours | Hypovolemia, acute kidney injury, obstruction |
| Pain | At or below the patient’s goal | New severe pain, pain out of proportion to findings, chest pain, sudden severe headache | Ischemia, compartment syndrome, dissection, subarachnoid hemorrhage |
| Capillary glucose | 70–99 mg/dL fasting | <70 mg/dL (treat, then recheck in 15 min) or >400 mg/dL | Hypoglycemia is an emergency; treat before you call |
Ranges shift dramatically across the lifespan, and a “normal adult” heart rate in an infant is bradycardia. Memorize the pediatric bands well enough to know when a number is wrong for the age in front of you. Note that the wide neonatal band applies only through 28 days of life; from 1 month on, the upper limit is 180, so a rate of 195 in a 2-month-old is not a normal newborn rate but a finding that prompts evaluation for supraventricular tachycardia, pain, fever, hypovolemia or sepsis.
| Age | Heart rate (awake, beats/min) | Respiratory rate (breaths/min) | Systolic BP (approximate lower limit) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neonate (birth to 28 days) | 100–205 | 30–60 | >60 mmHg |
| Infant (1 month to 1 year) | 100–180 | 30–53 | >70 mmHg |
| 1–2 years | 98–140 | 22–37 | >70 + (2 × age in years) |
| 3–5 years | 80–120 | 20–28 | >70 + (2 × age in years) |
| 6–11 years | 75–118 | 18–25 | >90 mmHg |
| 12–17 years | 60–100 | 12–20 | >90 mmHg |
| Pregnancy (2nd–3rd trimester) | Baseline rises 10–20 above pre-pregnancy | Unchanged rate; tidal volume rises | BP falls in 2nd trimester; ≥140/90 is abnormal and may signal preeclampsia |
| Older adult (65+) | 60–100 (blunted rise with stress) | 12–20 | Widened pulse pressure common; orthostatic drop common |
Closed-loop communication, read-back and the chain of command
Closed-loop communication (also called check-back) has three legs: the sender states the message, the receiver repeats it back in their own voice, and the sender confirms it was heard correctly. It is not optional for verbal or telephone orders and for critical laboratory values — it is a National Patient Safety Goal, and it is the practice that catches “fifteen” misheard as “fifty.” For medications, read back the drug name spelled out for sound-alikes, the dose with units, the route and the frequency: “Reading back: hydrALAZINE, h-y-d-r-a-l-a-z-i-n-e, 10 milligrams, IV push, one time now. Correct?”
A critical value is a laboratory result so far outside the expected range that it represents immediate risk — potassium below 2.5 or above 6.5 mmol/L, sodium below 120 or above 160 mmol/L, glucose below 50 or above 400 mg/dL, hemoglobin below 7 g/dL, platelets below 50,000/mm³, INR above 5, or a positive blood culture. When the lab calls one, you write it down, read it back, document the value, the name of the caller and the time, notify the provider, and document that notification with the time and the response. An undocumented notification is, legally, a notification that did not happen.
When you are worried and the person you called is not, you do not drop it. Use the graded assertiveness tools. CUS: “I am Concerned. I am Uncomfortable. This is a Safety issue.” Those words are recognized in most US hospitals as a formal stop signal. The two-challenge rule says that if you voice a concern twice and it is not acknowledged, you are obligated to escalate to the next level — charge nurse, rapid response team, nursing supervisor, attending physician, chief medical officer. You do not need permission to call a rapid response team, and in many facilities the patient or family can call one directly. Then document what you did, when, and to whom.
Escalation is a skill with defined numeric triggers, a defined structure (SBAR with an explicit recommendation), a defined verification step (read-back), and a defined path when you are not heard (CUS, the two-challenge rule, the chain of command).
Section 3Documentation: The Legal Record and How to Write It
What the chart is for, and the formats you will meet
The health record serves five purposes at once: it communicates with the team, it directs and evaluates care, it is the legal account of what happened, it drives reimbursement and coding, and it feeds quality and research data. The legal function is the one students underestimate. In a malpractice claim filed four years from now, the chart is the only witness that remembers. The standard the record is held to is simple and brutal: if it was not documented, it was not done — and the corollary, if it was documented but not done, that is fraud.
Six rules govern every entry regardless of format. Timely: chart as close to the event as possible, and never in advance — charting a medication before you give it is falsification even if you intend to give it in two minutes. Accurate and objective: record what you saw, heard, measured and did, not what you concluded about the patient’s character. Complete: include the assessment, the intervention, the patient’s response and any notification. Legible and permanent: black ink on paper, no pencil, no erasures, no white-out. Attributed: full signature with credentials, or your own EHR login — never share a password, never chart under another person’s login, and never let someone chart under yours. Chronological: use the facility’s clock convention, usually 24-hour time, and use late-entry format when you fall behind.
| Format | Structure | Where you will see it |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative | Chronological free-text paragraphs | Long-term care, home health, and the free-text box in any EHR |
| SOAP / SOAPIE | Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (+ Implementation, Evaluation) | Problem-oriented records; providers and advanced practice |
| Focus / DAR | Focus (a concern, not necessarily a diagnosis), Data, Action, Response | Acute care nursing notes; the most nurse-friendly narrative format |
| PIE | Problem, Intervention, Evaluation | Units that chart from the nursing care plan |
| Charting by exception | Only deviations from a defined normal are narrated; normals are checked off | High-volume acute units. Efficient, but weak in litigation unless the “normal” standard is explicitly defined in policy. |
| Flowsheets / EHR structured fields | Discrete timed data: vitals, intake and output, pain, restraints, wounds | Everywhere. Most of your documentation volume lives here. |
How to actually chart it: vague versus precise
The difference between a defensible note and a worthless one is specificity. A vague note tells a reader nothing about trend, and trend is the whole point. Read the pairs below and notice that the precise version is not longer than the vague version by much — it is just made of measurements instead of adjectives.
| Vague — do not write this | Precise — write this |
|---|---|
| “Patient had a good night.” | “0300 Pt asleep, resp even and unlabored at 16/min, SpO₂ 97 percent on RA. Awakened for repositioning to left side; denies pain (0/10). Call light within reach, bed low and locked, 2 side rails up.” |
| “Tolerated ambulation well.” | “1420 Ambulated 60 feet in hallway with front-wheeled walker and 1-person standby assist. Pre-ambulation HR 84, BP 128/74, SpO₂ 96 percent RA; post HR 96, BP 124/70, SpO₂ 94 percent RA. Steady gait, no dyspnea or dizziness reported. Returned to chair.” |
| “Dressing changed, wound looks better.” | “1030 Sacral pressure injury, Stage 2, measures 3.5 cm × 2.0 cm × 0.2 cm. Partial-thickness loss with exposed dermis; wound bed pink, moist and viable, no slough, eschar or odor. Scant serous drainage on removed dressing. Periwound skin intact, no induration or warmth. Cleansed with normal saline, hydrocolloid applied, dated and initialed. Pt denies pain at site (0/10). Repositioned right side, heels offloaded on pillow.” |
| “Patient is uncooperative and difficult.” | “1015 Pt declined morning bath and 1000 metoprolol. States ‘That pill makes me feel like I am underwater.’ Educated on purpose of medication and risk of abrupt discontinuation; pt verbalized understanding and continued to decline. Dr. Alvarez notified at 1020, aware, no new orders. Pt remains alert, HR 88, BP 142/86.” |
| “Patient fell.” (unwitnessed) | “0215 Pt found sitting on floor at right side of bed on entering room in response to bed alarm. States ‘I was trying to get to the bathroom.’ No LOC reported by pt. Neuro check: alert, oriented ×4, PERRL, equal grip, no visible head injury. 3 cm superficial abrasion right elbow, no active bleeding. Denies neck, back or hip pain; no deformity, shortening or external rotation of either leg; full active ROM all extremities before moving. HR 92, BP 132/78, RR 18, SpO₂ 96 percent RA, glucose 118. Assisted to bed with 2-person assist using gait belt. Dr. Alvarez notified 0222; orders received for neuro checks q1h ×4. Family notified 0230.” |
| “Complained of chest pain, gave nitro.” | “0940 Pt reports substernal chest pressure 7/10, non-radiating, onset at rest 5 minutes ago, associated with nausea and diaphoresis. HR 104, BP 148/88, RR 22, SpO₂ 94 percent RA, afebrile. 12-lead ECG obtained 0942 and shown to Dr. Alvarez. Nitroglycerin 0.4 mg SL given 0944 per protocol. 0949 pain 3/10, BP 132/76. 0954 pain 0/10.” |
Chart what you assess in the order you assessed it, because the order is part of the technique. The standard sequence for every body region is inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation. The abdomen is the exception: inspect, then auscultate, then percuss, then palpate — because percussing or palpating first mechanically stimulates the bowel and alters the bowel sounds you are about to report. Charting “abdomen soft, non-tender, bowel sounds present” when you palpated before you listened is documenting a finding you contaminated. A correct entry reads: “1100 Abdomen inspected: flat, symmetric, no distention, scars or visible pulsation. Bowel sounds active ×4 quadrants. Tympany throughout except dullness over liver. Soft, non-tender to light and deep palpation, no masses or guarding.”
Describing skin findings across skin tones. Pallor, cyanosis, jaundice and erythema are described in most textbooks as they appear in lightly pigmented skin, and students then miss them entirely in patients with darker skin. Do not chart “pink and well perfused” as a reflex on every patient. Assess and describe the sites where pigment interferes least — the oral mucosa, conjunctivae, sclerae, tongue, nail beds, palms and soles — and compare with the patient’s own uninvolved skin. Also palpate, because in darkly pigmented skin, erythema and early pressure injury are more reliably detected as warmth, induration, edema or a change in texture than as redness.
| Finding | Lightly pigmented skin | Darkly pigmented skin — where and how to look | Chart it as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanosis | Blue-gray lips, nail beds, skin | Skin appears ashen or gray; check conjunctivae, oral mucosa, tongue, palms and soles for dusky gray-blue tone | “Oral mucosa and tongue dusky gray; nail beds gray-blue; SpO₂ 86 percent RA. Oxygen applied, HOB elevated, rapid response called 1412.” |
| Pallor | Loss of pink tone, white or waxy | Skin loses underlying red tones and appears yellow-brown or ashen; conjunctivae and palmar creases pale | “Conjunctivae pale, palmar creases pale, skin ashen compared with baseline.” |
| Jaundice | Yellow skin and sclerae | Check sclerae (avoid confusing with normal subconjunctival fat, which is yellow only peripherally), hard palate, palms and soles | “Sclerae icteric bilaterally; yellow discoloration of hard palate and palms.” |
| Erythema / inflammation | Redness, warmth | May appear purple, violaceous, darker than surrounding skin or not visibly discolored at all — palpate for warmth, firmness, edema, and ask about pain or itching | “Right calf warm and firm to touch, 2 cm larger circumference than left, darker and violaceous compared with surrounding skin, tender. Dr. Alvarez notified 1505 for possible DVT.” |
| Petechiae | Pinpoint red-purple spots | Best seen on the abdomen, buttocks, oral mucosa and conjunctivae | “Scattered non-blanching pinpoint purple macules on buccal mucosa and lower abdomen.” |
Errors, abbreviations, privacy and EHR-specific traps
Correcting an error on paper: draw a single line through the entry so the original remains readable, write “error” or “mistaken entry” above or beside it, add your initials, the date and the time, and then write the correct entry. Never obliterate, erase, use correction fluid or write over. In the EHR: use the built-in amendment or addendum function; the original stays in the audit trail forever regardless, so never attempt to hide anything. A late entry is labeled as such: “1900 Late entry for 1345 — ...” Backdating an entry to make it look contemporaneous is fraud.
The Joint Commission Do Not Use list applies to all orders and all handwritten and free-text documentation: do not write U or u (write “unit”), IU (write “international unit”), Q.D., QD, q.d., qd (write “daily”), Q.O.D., QOD (write “every other day”), a trailing zero (write 1 mg, never 1.0 mg), a missing leading zero (write 0.5 mg, never .5 mg), and MS, MSO₄, MgSO₄ (write “morphine sulfate” or “magnesium sulfate”). Each of these has killed people: 1.0 mg read as 10 mg is a tenfold overdose.
Privacy. Protected health information is anything that identifies the patient combined with health information. Under HIPAA you access only the records of patients in your care — not your neighbor’s, not a celebrity’s, not your own family member’s without authorization — and every access is logged and audited. Do not discuss patients in elevators, hallways or cafeterias. Do not photograph a patient, a wound or a monitor with a personal phone. Do not post anything on social media, including de-identified stories, room numbers or shift complaints; nurses lose licenses for this every year. Log out of the workstation every time you walk away.
Finally, two EHR-specific hazards. Copy-forward propagates yesterday’s assessment into today’s note, which means it propagates yesterday’s errors and makes the record legally indefensible; if you copy anything forward, you must read and edit every line. Wrong-patient charting happens when multiple charts are open; verify the name and date of birth on the banner before every entry. And keep the incident or variance report out of the medical record entirely — document the facts of what happened to the patient and the notification in the chart, complete the incident report separately as a quality-improvement document, and never write “incident report filed” in the nursing note, because doing so drags the report into discovery.
Documentation is objective, timed, attributed and specific enough to show a trend — measurements and quotations, never adjectives and conclusions — and it is written in the sequence the assessment was actually performed.
Section 4Handoff and Transitions of Care
Why handoffs fail, and the structures that fix them
A handoff is the transfer of responsibility and accountability for a patient from one clinician to another, along with the information required to act. It happens at shift change, at breaks, at transfer between units, at transport to and from procedures, and at discharge. It is the highest-risk moment in a hospital stay because responsibility can quietly land on nobody. Analyses of sentinel events repeatedly find handoff communication among the leading contributing factors, and the estimated cost of communication failure in US hospitals runs into the billions of dollars annually.
Handoffs fail for predictable reasons: information overload (a fifteen-minute recitation of the entire chart, with the critical item buried in minute eleven), omission of pending items (a culture that has not resulted, a scan that has not been read), interruptions, distraction, no opportunity to ask questions, and no explicit statement of who now owns the patient. The fixes are structural. Use a standardized format every time. Give the receiver protected, uninterrupted time. End with questions and an explicit transfer: “You have her.”
I-PASS is the best-validated structure; its implementation across pediatric residency programs was associated with a roughly 30 percent reduction in preventable adverse events without lengthening handoffs. Many nursing units use ISBAR instead, which is fine — consistency matters more than which acronym.
| I-PASS element | What you say | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Illness severity | Stable, “watcher,” or unstable — one word, said first | “Bed 12 is a watcher.” |
| Patient summary | Name, age, code status, diagnosis, day of stay, events of this shift | “Ellen Marks, 68, full code, POD 1 right hip ORIF. Desaturated to 88 percent at 0200, now on 4 liters, CTPA negative for PE, thought to be atelectasis.” |
| Action list | What must be done, by whom, and by when | “Incentive spirometer q1h while awake, out of bed to chair with PT at 1000, recheck CBC at 1200.” |
| Situation awareness and contingency planning | What might go wrong and exactly what to do if it does | “If her SpO₂ drops below 92 on 4 liters, get an ABG and call Dr. Reyes; she has a standing order for a chest x-ray.” |
| Synthesis by receiver | The receiving nurse reads back the plan and asks questions | “So: watcher, POD 1 hip, desat overnight, spirometer hourly, chair at 1000, CBC at noon, ABG and call if she drops below 92. Anything pending?” |
Bedside shift report: how it is actually done
Bedside shift report moves handoff from the nurses’ station into the room, with the patient and (with the patient’s permission) family present. It is associated with fewer falls during shift change, fewer call-light requests immediately after report, better patient experience scores and earlier catching of errors — because the patient is the only person in the building who was present for the entire admission. Run it like this:
1. Introduce. Both nurses enter together; the off-going nurse introduces the on-coming nurse by name and role. 2. Invite. Ask the patient’s permission for anyone else present to hear the report. 3. Report. Use your standard format, speak to the patient rather than across them, and avoid jargon — say “your kidney function test” rather than “creatinine trending up.” 4. Look. Do a joint visual check together: IV site and what is infusing at what rate, drains and output, oxygen and flow rate, dressings, drips and pumps, the last dose of pain medication, the fall-risk and skin-risk status, the safety items — bed low and locked, call light in reach, non-skid socks. 5. Involve. Ask the patient what their most important goal is for this shift. 6. Close. The on-coming nurse restates the plan, answers questions, and updates the whiteboard with their name and the goal.
Two judgment calls. First, sensitive information — a new cancer diagnosis the patient has not been told, HIV status, substance use, suspected abuse, a psychiatric history — is discussed outside the room or in general terms, then completed privately. Second, if the patient is asleep, you still enter, verify identity and the safety items visually, and keep voices low; you do not skip the room.
Transfers, procedures and discharge
Unit-to-unit transfer requires a nurse-to-nurse verbal report, not just a note. Include everything in I-PASS plus: isolation precautions and why, allergies, code status and any advance directive, lines and tubes with insertion dates, last medication doses (especially opioids, anticoagulants and antibiotics), pending results, and family contact and who has been notified of what. Send the belongings and the assistive devices — glasses, hearing aids, dentures, walker — and document what went with the patient. Procedure and OR handoffs add: NPO status and time, site marking, consent, last anticoagulant dose, and blood availability.
Discharge is a handoff to the patient, and it is where most preventable readmissions are born. Do not deliver it in the last ten minutes while the wheelchair waits. Start discharge teaching on admission. At discharge, cover in plain language: medications (what, why, when, what to stop — reconcile against the home list explicitly), follow-up appointments with date, time and address, activity and diet restrictions, wound or device care demonstrated back to you, and above all the warning signs that mean call the office or come back, written down and specific: a temperature above 38.0 °C (100.4 °F), redness spreading from the incision, calf pain or swelling, shortness of breath, chest pain, or an inability to keep fluids down. Then use teach-back on the two most dangerous items, and document that you did, including the patient’s response.
A handoff is complete only when it is standardized, includes contingency planning for what might go wrong, and ends with the receiver saying the plan back — and at the bedside, with the patient included as a source of truth.
Section 5Delegation, Difficult Conversations and Conflict
Delegating to UAP: what transfers and what never does
Delegation is the transfer of the authority to perform a selected task in a selected situation to a competent person, while the RN retains accountability for the outcome. That last clause is the one to burn in. You can delegate the task; you can never delegate the accountability, and you can never delegate the thinking steps of the nursing process — assessment, nursing diagnosis, planning, teaching and evaluation. Distinguish delegation from assignment, which is the routine transfer of activities that are already within the receiver’s own scope of practice.
The five rights of delegation are the checklist: the right task (delegable, repetitive, predictable, with a predictable outcome), under the right circumstance (a stable patient, appropriate setting, available resources), to the right person (verified competence for this task with this patient, not just a job title), with the right direction and communication (specific, measurable, with limits and a reporting threshold), and the right supervision and evaluation (you monitor, intervene as needed, evaluate the outcome and give feedback).
| May be delegated to UAP | Stays with the RN — never delegated |
|---|---|
| Vital signs on a stable patient | The initial and any ongoing assessment, and interpretation of any data |
| Bathing, oral care, perineal care, hygiene, bed-making | Nursing diagnosis and care planning |
| Assisting with feeding a patient without swallowing difficulty | Feeding a patient with dysphagia or aspiration risk |
| Ambulation, transfers and positioning of a stable patient | First ambulation after surgery or after epidural, or any unstable patient |
| Measuring and recording intake and output, weights | Evaluation of the patient’s response to any intervention |
| Blood-glucose fingersticks (where policy permits) | Patient and family teaching in any form |
| Specimen collection, applying non-sterile dressings (per policy) | Medication administration (except where state law permits certified medication aides) |
| Stocking, transporting, reporting observations | Any care of an unstable or unpredictable patient; anything requiring clinical judgment |
Delegate in a sentence with numbers and a threshold, then require a check-back. Weak: “Can you get vitals on 12?” Strong: “Marcus, please take a full set of vitals on Mrs. Marks in 412 within the next fifteen minutes, and come tell me right away if her heart rate is above 110, her systolic is below 100, or her oxygen saturation is below 92 percent. Write them in the flowsheet and let me know when they are in. Does that work with what else you have?” The final question is not politeness — it surfaces the fact that Marcus already has two showers and a transport, which is information you need before you count on those vitals. Licensed practical/vocational nurses have a broader scope than UAP that varies by state; they commonly administer many medications, perform sterile procedures and reinforce teaching, but the initial comprehensive assessment, the care plan, IV push medications in many states, and blood administration typically remain with the RN.
Hard conversations: anger, bad news, refusal
The angry patient or family member. Anger at the bedside is almost always fear, grief, pain or powerlessness in disguise. Do not match volume. Position yourself with a clear exit path behind you, keep your hands visible and open, lower your voice slightly, and use the sequence: acknowledge, apologize for the experience without admitting fault where none is established, ask, and act. “I can see you’re furious, and waiting four hours for pain medicine would make me furious too. I’m sorry that happened. Tell me what is most urgent right now and I’ll deal with that first.” Then actually do the thing and come back when you said you would. If the person becomes threatening, leave, get help and notify security; you are never obligated to remain in a room where you are unsafe, and workplace violence is a reportable event.
Bad news and hard questions. When a patient asks “Am I dying?”, the worst answers are false reassurance and deflection. Explore before you inform: “That’s a big question. What are you most worried about?” Diagnosis and prognosis disclosure belongs to the provider, but the conversation afterward belongs largely to you: silence, presence, permission to cry, and honest answers to the questions you can answer. Do not fill the silence.
Refusal of care. A competent adult may refuse anything, including care you believe is life-saving. Your obligations are to ensure the refusal is informed, to notify the provider, and to document. Document the specific care refused, the education provided, the consequences explained, the patient’s stated reason in their own words, the assessment of decision-making capacity, the provider notified with the time, and any alternative offered and accepted. For discharge against medical advice, document the risks explained, that the patient could state them back, whether they signed the AMA form, and that they were told they may return at any time — refusing to sign the form does not invalidate the departure and does not void insurance coverage, a common and harmful myth.
Conflict with the team, and speaking up in a hierarchy
Conflict on a unit is not a character flaw; it is structural, and unresolved conflict is a patient-safety hazard. The five classic modes are avoiding, accommodating, competing, compromising and collaborating. Collaborating produces the best long-term outcome and takes the most time; competing is appropriate only in an emergency when one person must direct. Most day-to-day disagreement is best handled with an I-statement and a specific request delivered privately: “When the 0800 medications were still in the drawer at 1000, I had to re-time the whole day and the patient missed a dose. I need us to check the drawer together at handoff.” Blame is “you never,” and it ends the conversation.
Disruptive or intimidating behavior — belittling, throwing, refusing to answer a page, public humiliation — is not something to absorb quietly. The Joint Commission considers such behavior a patient-safety issue precisely because it makes people stop speaking up. Document the facts objectively, report through your chain of command, and use CUS language in the moment. If you are a student or a new graduate, this is genuinely hard; use the words anyway, and remember that a rapid response call needs no one’s permission.
Finally, when an error occurs, communication is a duty rather than a choice. Assess and stabilize the patient first, notify the provider, follow the facility’s disclosure policy, complete the incident report, and document in the chart only the objective facts about the patient: what was given or done, the assessment, the notification with the time, the interventions and the response. Never chart speculation, never chart blame, and never chart that a report was filed.
You may delegate tasks but never assessment, teaching, evaluation or the unstable patient — and whether you are directing a UAP, defusing an angry family or challenging a physician, the message must be specific, measurable and closed with a check-back.
The chapter in one breath
Communication is the vehicle that carries assessment into action, and every leg of the trip has a technique. With the patient, sit down, orient yourself and your role, ask open-ended questions, tolerate silence, avoid false reassurance and “why” questions, use a qualified medical interpreter rather than a family member, and verify understanding with teach-back. With the team, use SBAR — and finish it with an explicit recommendation, because a report without an ask is not an escalation. Know the numbers that mean call now: respirations under 8 or over 28, systolic under 90, heart rate under 40 or over 130, SpO₂ under 90 percent, urine output under 30 mL/hr, any new confusion, and in an older adult a temperature over 37.8 °C or simply “not herself.” Close every loop: read back verbal orders and critical values, and if you are not heard, use CUS, the two-challenge rule and the chain of command. Document objectively, with measurements and quotations rather than adjectives, in the sequence the exam was performed — inspect, palpate, percuss, auscultate, except the abdomen, where auscultation comes second. Describe skin findings at the mucosa, conjunctivae, palms and soles so they are not missed in darker skin. Hand off with a standardized structure, contingency plans and a read-back at the bedside. Delegate tasks; keep assessment, teaching, evaluation and the unstable patient.
Words worth knowing
| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Therapeutic communication | Goal-directed, patient-centered interaction using deliberate techniques to build trust and gather accurate data. |
| Open-ended question | A question that cannot be answered yes or no, eliciting the patient’s own account (“Tell me about...”). |
| Non-therapeutic response | A reply that closes communication — false reassurance, advice-giving, “why” questions, changing the subject. |
| Teach-back | Asking the patient to restate instructions in their own words to verify the teaching, not to test the patient. |
| Qualified medical interpreter | A trained, credentialed interpreter provided by the facility; legally required for limited English proficiency, and never a family member or child. |
| SBAR / ISBAR | Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (with Introduction) — the standard structure for urgent clinical communication. |
| Closed-loop communication | Sender states, receiver repeats back, sender confirms. Required for verbal orders and critical values. |
| Read-back | Verbatim repetition of a verbal or telephone order, including drug spelling, dose, route and frequency. |
| Critical value | A lab result representing immediate danger (for example K⁺ below 2.5 or above 6.5 mmol/L) that must be read back, documented and reported at once. |
| Early warning score (MEWS/NEWS) | A points system converting vital signs into a numeric deterioration risk that triggers a defined escalation response. |
| CUS / two-challenge rule | “Concerned, Uncomfortable, Safety issue”; if a concern is raised twice without acknowledgment, you must escalate up the chain of command. |
| Charting by exception | Documenting only deviations from a policy-defined normal; efficient but legally weak unless the normal standard is explicit. |
| Focus (DAR) charting | A note structured as Data, Action, Response around a focus such as pain, mobility or a patient concern. |
| Late entry | An entry made after the fact, labeled with both the current time and the time of the event; never backdated. |
| Do Not Use abbreviations | The prohibited list: U, IU, Q.D., Q.O.D., trailing zeros (1.0 mg), missing leading zeros (.5 mg), MS, MSO₄, MgSO₄. |
| PHI / HIPAA | Protected health information and the federal law governing it; access is limited to patients in your care and every access is audited. |
| Incident (variance) report | A separate quality-improvement document about an adverse event; never filed in or referenced within the medical record. |
| Handoff / I-PASS | Transfer of responsibility with the information to act; I-PASS = Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness, Synthesis by receiver. |
| Bedside shift report | Handoff conducted in the room with the patient present, including a joint visual safety and equipment check. |
| Delegation and the five rights | Transferring a task while retaining accountability: right task, circumstance, person, direction/communication, and supervision/evaluation. |